andrew schneider investigates

May 4, 2009

Truth be damned. Some watchers of the W.R. Grace criminal trial say two little words from defense lawyer “special relationship” could sway the jury’s verdict.

There is a slight lingering stench in the Missoula courtroom where the criminal trial of W.R. Grace is two days from going to the jury.

Many blame it on the odorous performance of Grace’s star lawyer David Bernick and his repeated assertions that a Robert Marsden, an EPA criminal investigator had a “special relationship” with discredited witness Robert Locke.

The old photo of Grace's top legal gun David Bernick came from his firm's website.

The old photo of Grace's top legal gun David Bernick came from his firm's website.

With a theatrical delivery, feigned disgust, that a Shakespearian player would covet, Bernick read from innocuous emails between the agent and the witness as if they were confessions of drug dealings, or payoffs, or selling little children or possessing WMDs.

Few dispute that the prosecution screwed up its obligation under law to get information and documents on Locke — a former Grace official and crucial witness — promptly to the defense, and they’ve been punished for it. But that has nothing to do with the deceptive picture Bernick has painted for the jury on the spurious “special relationship.”

I shared some examples of language from some the emails that the enormously successful corporate lawyer used as the basis of his accusations with  seven lawyers or law professors and past or current federal investigators.

All concluded that the electronic correspondence indicated that Marsden’s actions were appropriate, completely professional and just the way investigators routinely work to maintain contact with a witness. There was nothing “special” about it.

Some legal observers say it won’t matter in the end and that the jury will see through Bernick’s ploy.

Maybe.

I have greater concerns. While I know that the sometimes distasteful Bernick is considered by the business press to be among the best there is in defending corporations like Grace, tobacco companies and makers of breast implants, I am amazed that an experienced jurist like Judge Donald Molloy didn‘t yell foul  at the “special relationship” ploy.

His honor has referred to the phrase from the bench — both verbally, and I’m told, in writing. Some people who say they have known or appeared before the judge for ten or more years say that with Molloy’s knowledge of how investigators function, they can’t believe that the judge permitted Bernick’s charade.

Molloy repeatedly insists that all of his rulings and action are based on law and not something he cobbles up behind the closed doors of his chamber.

Advertisements

4 Comments »

  1. Dear Mr Schneider

    Curious as to why you aren’t more offended/bothered by Locke’s alleged perjury? Or Parker’s memory lapse?

    Comment by truth not be damned — May 4, 2009 @ 14:02 | Reply

    • You’re making an assumption that I’m not offended. But true or not, Locke’s testimony has been mostly gutted. Parker’s memory lapses will be weighed by the jury. Mr. Bernick is an officer of the court and has a different level of obligation. Thank for your comment.

      a

      Comment by Andrew Schneider — May 4, 2009 @ 14:08 | Reply

  2. In my line of work (including wetlands and rare plants) we hav name for Grace’s “experts:” biostitutes. They always conclude it isn’t really a wetland. They never find the rare plants. Etc. Andrew: putting on your prognosticator’s hat, do you think the jury will swallow Mr. No-Elevated-Risk -Despite-All-The-Bodies’ dissembling? Any sign of their reaction?

    Comment by Steve Ericksn — May 4, 2009 @ 20:46 | Reply

    • Steve, there were some grimaces from a couple of jurors at the asbestos-is-good-for-you statements but I never try to predict what a jury will do because I’m almost always wrong

      Comment by Andrew Schneider — May 5, 2009 @ 04:19 | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: