andrew schneider investigates

March 11, 2009

W.R. Grace lawyer tries to show that government concealed more secrets on Libby than the company on trial.

Filed under: Uncategorized — Andrew Schneider @ 21:02

By the end of testimony at the W.R. Grace criminal trial today, I was thinking that some of the jurors and many of the spectators were beginning to believe that the federal government was more guilty at concealing the asbestos dangers in  Libby, Mont.,  than the international chemical company that’s on trial.

But I’ll come back to this later.

Most of the day was spent watching Grace’s top lawyer – David Bernick – trying to skewer senior government public health doc Aubrey Miller. But the specialist in environmental and occupational medicine dodged almost every thrust.


Bernick’s  mission was to discredit Miller in the eyes of jurors and taint the hours of fairly persuasive testimony the doctor has presented the day before.

He accused Miller, who was the medical officer for the EPA team that rushed to Libby, of concealing facts from the jury in his testimony, such as not describing all facets of the asbestos disease that killed a Libby woman in 1987.

It was clear that no one had collected the information when Margrat Vatland died, but that didn’t prevent Bernick from barking, “You didn’t tell the jury, did you?

It became his mantra for the morning.

Bernick demanded that Miller explain why the EPA had declared Libby an emergency cleanup site when it didn’t have the proof of the danger.

And with machine-gun speed, he followed with: Wasn’t it was the only way EPA could get cleanup money from headquarters without first completing a complex study in the risks facing townsfolk?

If he wanted Miller to stumble, it didn’t happen.

You had to wonder whether the prosecution team had been Super-glued to their chairs. Asst. U.S. Attorney Kris McLean rose only once to object to Bernick’s haranguing, as opposed to the 60-plus objections the defense had launched the day before.

Miller refused to let the defense limit his answers to complex or multi-part questions to a simple yes or no. But a dozen or more times Bernick cut Miller with a cry of “not responsive,” and asked the judge to have Miller’s comment struck from the record.

The Grace lawyer practiced the competitive sport of cross-examination with a wireless mike in one hand and a red and black marker in the other.

His footwork was masterful and he deserved points for agility as he slid his  body between the podium – the area where Judge Molloy and the court stenographer want lawyers to ask their questions – and an enormous white board on a shaky easel so he could draw a line or two, then write a date, a word or a phrase.

By the afternoon questioning, it seemed that the 4X8-foot white board was angled towards the judge and Miller, and it appeared  only the three or four jurors in the end seats could see Bernick’s intricate artwork.

It was almost 4 p.m. when defense lawyer Thomas Frongillo took his shots at Miller. He pushed for answers, but somewhat more gently.
He walked Miller through the timeline that Molloy set for the knowing endangerment counts in the indictment, the most severe of the eight criminal charges brought against Grace and five former executives.

He questioned the language used in EPA plans for announcing the results of the first asbestos testing in town, and then raised an issued that McLean could have gone all month without hearing again.

Frongillo questioned Miller at length on four studies that the Libby EPA team discovered that showed in painful detail that Grace wasn’t the only party in this trial that had kept secret the asbestos dangers confronting Libby and its citizens.

He quoted from studies funded by EPA  in the 1970s and 1980s, which, in great detail, told of the asbestos in the vermiculite, the risk to workers, the community and consumers using or exposed to the tainted vermiculite Grace sold throughout the world.

EPA wasn’t the only federal agency keeping the secret. Frongillo  asked the physician, who is now medical adviser on bioterrorism to the FDA commissioner, about studies by OSHA and the Consumer Product Safety Board – also done in the 70s and both promising regulations and warnings on vermiculite products from Libby. Neither delivered.

The lawyer shook his head, lowered his voice a bit and asked Miller if it wasn’t true that EPA had known of the asbestos danger in Libby almost as long as the agency has existed.

Frongillo said EPA was founded in 1970. Grace admitted it had asbestos in it’s vermiculite in 1971.

The judge adjourned for the day before the doctor could answer.


Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: